Broker execution scoreboard
Broker execution scoreboard
Broker execution comparison
Both brokers are measured from real fills on connected accounts — never from reviews or marketing. Every displayed metric has at least 30 observations from one account on each side, and the execution scores normalize per symbol, so neither broker gains from trading easier symbols. Spread uses the closest pre-fill tick. Unsupported cells remain N/A. No winner is declared: the honest answer depends on the symbols and sessions you trade.
Lower value in bold — a fact per metric, not a verdict. Slippage and spread are in symbol points; latency in milliseconds.
| Symbol | Blueberry Markets slippage | BTGT Mauritius Capital slippage | Blueberry Markets latency | BTGT Mauritius Capital latency | Blueberry Markets spread | BTGT Mauritius Capital spread | Fills (A/B) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XAUUSD | 1.0360 obs · 2 accts | 5.0161 obs · 1 acct | 169 ms604 obs · 2 accts | 400 ms194 obs · 1 acct | 16.3316 obs · 1 acct | 13.6388 obs · 1 acct | 634 / 428 |
Across 1 shared symbol, median slippage: Blueberry Markets measured lower on 1.
Across 1 shared symbol, median fill latency: Blueberry Markets measured lower on 1.
From real fills on connected accounts at both brokers. Every metric needs at least 30 observations from one account on each side; unsupported cells stay N/A (1 shared symbol with usable evidence today). No reviews, broker marketing or affiliate links.
Full reviews: Blueberry Markets · BTGT Mauritius Capital — or connect an account read-only and put your own fills in these numbers.