Brokers / head-to-head
Blueberry Markets vs Startrader — measured execution
1 shared symbol with supported evidence · measured, not claimed
Both brokers are measured from real fills on connected accounts — never from reviews or marketing. Every displayed metric has at least 50 observations from two accounts on each side, and the execution scores normalize per symbol, so neither broker gains from trading easier symbols. Spread uses the closest pre-fill tick. Unsupported cells remain N/A. No winner is declared: the honest answer depends on the symbols and sessions you trade.
- Across 1 shared symbol, median slippage: 1 within measurement noise.
- Across 1 shared symbol, median fill latency: Startrader on 1.
Blueberry Markets
Startrader
Shared symbols, side by side
Lower value in bold — a fact per metric, not a verdict. Slippage and spread are in symbol points; latency in milliseconds.
| Symbol | Blueberry Markets slippage | Startrader slippage | Blueberry Markets latency | Startrader latency | Blueberry Markets spread | Startrader spread | Fills (A/B) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XAUUSD | 0.0459 obs · 2 accts | 0.0295 obs · 4 accts | 167 ms716 obs · 2 accts | 137 ms1,460 obs · 4 accts | N/A0 obs · 0 accts | N/A216 obs · 3 accts | 766 / 1,746 |
Fill latency, month by month
Median across all symbols — latency is the one metric that compares across symbols.
FAQ
Does Blueberry Markets or Startrader have lower measured slippage?
Across 1 shared symbol, median slippage: 1 within measurement noise.
Which fills faster, Blueberry Markets or Startrader?
Across 1 shared symbol, median fill latency: Startrader on 1.
How is this comparison measured?
From real fills on connected accounts at both brokers. Every metric needs at least 50 observations from two accounts on each side; unsupported cells stay N/A (1 shared symbol with usable evidence today). No reviews, broker marketing or affiliate links.
Full reviews: Blueberry Markets · Startrader — or connect an account read-only and put your own fills in these numbers.