Broker execution scoreboard
Broker execution scoreboard
Broker execution comparison
Both brokers are measured from real fills on connected accounts — never from reviews or marketing. Every displayed metric has at least 30 observations from one account on each side, and the execution scores normalize per symbol, so neither broker gains from trading easier symbols. Spread uses the closest pre-fill tick. Unsupported cells remain N/A. No winner is declared: the honest answer depends on the symbols and sessions you trade.
Lower value in bold — a fact per metric, not a verdict. Slippage and spread are in symbol points; latency in milliseconds.
| Symbol | BTGT Mauritius Capital slippage | Mega Fusion Group slippage | BTGT Mauritius Capital latency | Mega Fusion Group latency | BTGT Mauritius Capital spread | Mega Fusion Group spread | Fills (A/B) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XAUUSD | 5.0161 obs · 1 acct | 8.0803 obs · 4 accts | 400 ms194 obs · 1 acct | 104 ms1,066 obs · 4 accts | 13.6388 obs · 1 acct | 9.4589 obs · 2 accts | 428 / 1,092 |
Median across all symbols — latency is the one metric that compares across symbols.
Across 1 shared symbol, median slippage: BTGT Mauritius Capital measured lower on 1.
Across 1 shared symbol, median fill latency: Mega Fusion Group on 1.
From real fills on connected accounts at both brokers. Every metric needs at least 30 observations from one account on each side; unsupported cells stay N/A (1 shared symbol with usable evidence today). No reviews, broker marketing or affiliate links.
Full reviews: BTGT Mauritius Capital · Mega Fusion Group — or connect an account read-only and put your own fills in these numbers.