Broker execution scoreboard
Broker execution scoreboard
Broker execution comparison
Both brokers are measured from real fills on connected accounts — never from reviews or marketing. Every displayed metric has at least 30 observations from one account on each side, and the execution scores normalize per symbol, so neither broker gains from trading easier symbols. Spread uses the closest pre-fill tick. Unsupported cells remain N/A. No winner is declared: the honest answer depends on the symbols and sessions you trade.
Lower value in bold — a fact per metric, not a verdict. Slippage and spread are in symbol points; latency in milliseconds.
| Symbol | Blueberry Markets slippage | IC Trading slippage | Blueberry Markets latency | IC Trading latency | Blueberry Markets spread | IC Trading spread | Fills (A/B) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XAUUSD | 3.0275 obs · 2 accts | 4.0195 obs · 2 accts | 167 ms509 obs · 2 accts | 43 ms568 obs · 2 accts | 16.9260 obs · 1 acct | 11.1397 obs · 2 accts | 520 / 940 |
Median across all symbols — latency is the one metric that compares across symbols.
Across 1 shared symbol, median slippage: Blueberry Markets measured lower on 1.
Across 1 shared symbol, median fill latency: IC Trading on 1.
From real fills on connected accounts at both brokers. Every metric needs at least 30 observations from one account on each side; unsupported cells stay N/A (1 shared symbol with usable evidence today). No reviews, broker marketing or affiliate links.
Full reviews: Blueberry Markets · IC Trading — or connect an account read-only and put your own fills in these numbers.