Relative execution score
—
N/A — still collecting
Broker execution
IC Trading — measured execution review
944 measured fills · data through 22 Jul 2026, 16:12 UTC
Based on 944 real fills across 1 connected account, IC Trading shows execution data still accumulating. Everything below is measured from broker-reported order history and tick data — here's the full methodology. It is not a paid review; there are no affiliate links.
Rank
—
among qualified brokers
Price accuracy
—
slippage vs peers, per symbol
Speed
—
fill latency vs peers
Spread
—
at fill time vs peers
Fill quality
Where your executed price landed vs the price requested.
Not enough slippage data to split fills yet.
By session
Execution quality across the trading day (UTC windows).
| Session | Median slippage | p95 slippage | Median latency | Avg spread | Fills |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asia (00–07 UTC) | N/A — insufficient evidence | N/A — insufficient evidence | N/A — insufficient evidence | N/A — insufficient evidence | 27 |
| New York (13–21 UTC) | N/A — insufficient evidence | N/A — insufficient evidence | N/A — insufficient evidence | N/A — insufficient evidence | 9 |
By symbol
Data completeness: latency 94% · spread 10% of fills (missing values come from brokers without ms timestamps or tick history).
| Symbol | Median slippage | ≈ per 1 lot | p95 slippage | Median latency | Avg spread | Fills |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XAUUSD | N/A — insufficient evidence | — | N/A — insufficient evidence | N/A — insufficient evidence | N/A — insufficient evidence | 446 |
| EURUSD | N/A — insufficient evidence | — | N/A — insufficient evidence | N/A — insufficient evidence | N/A — insufficient evidence | 406 |
| GBPUSD | N/A — insufficient evidence | — | N/A — insufficient evidence | N/A — insufficient evidence | N/A — insufficient evidence | 52 |
| DE40 | N/A — insufficient evidence | — | N/A — insufficient evidence | N/A — insufficient evidence | N/A — insufficient evidence | 36 |
| BTCUSD | N/A — insufficient evidence | — | N/A — insufficient evidence | N/A — insufficient evidence | N/A — insufficient evidence | 4 |
Measured from real fills: requested vs executed price from order history, latency from broker millisecond timestamps, spread from the broker’s closest pre-fill tick. Unsupported metrics remain N/A and expose their observation, account and coverage counts on hover. History is broker-reported.
FAQ
Is IC Trading's execution good?
Not enough comparable data yet: IC Trading has 944 measured fills. The raw measurements on this page are still real — treat them as indicative.
How is this measured?
From real fills on connected accounts: slippage compares each order's requested vs executed price in symbol points; latency is the broker's own order-received to order-filled millisecond timestamps; spread uses the closest pre-fill tick in the broker's history. Every displayed metric needs 50 observations from two accounts.
How often does this page update?
Continuously — connected accounts sync about hourly, and every new fill lands in these statistics. The monthly charts use medians, so one news spike doesn't repaint a month.
Want your own fills in these numbers? Connect an account read-only— your broker's stats sharpen with every fill, and you get the full trade journal on top.