Broker execution scoreboard
Broker execution scoreboard
Broker execution comparison
Both brokers are measured from real fills on connected accounts — never from reviews or marketing. Every displayed metric has at least 30 observations from one account on each side, and the execution scores normalize per symbol, so neither broker gains from trading easier symbols. Spread uses the closest pre-fill tick. Unsupported cells remain N/A. No winner is declared: the honest answer depends on the symbols and sessions you trade.
Lower value in bold — a fact per metric, not a verdict. Slippage and spread are in symbol points; latency in milliseconds.
| Symbol | Blueberry Markets slippage | TMGM (TradeMax Global) slippage | Blueberry Markets latency | TMGM (TradeMax Global) latency | Blueberry Markets spread | TMGM (TradeMax Global) spread | Fills (A/B) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XAUUSD | 3.0252 obs · 2 accts | 30.080 obs · 1 acct | 167 ms477 obs · 2 accts | 37 ms711 obs · 3 accts | 17.0242 obs · 1 acct | 13.4625 obs · 3 accts | 484 / 790 |
Median across all symbols — latency is the one metric that compares across symbols.
Across 1 shared symbol, median slippage: Blueberry Markets measured lower on 1.
Across 1 shared symbol, median fill latency: TMGM (TradeMax Global) on 1.
From real fills on connected accounts at both brokers. Every metric needs at least 30 observations from one account on each side; unsupported cells stay N/A (1 shared symbol with usable evidence today). No reviews, broker marketing or affiliate links.
Full reviews: Blueberry Markets · TMGM (TradeMax Global) — or connect an account read-only and put your own fills in these numbers.