Relative execution score
97
1/3 measured components · partial
Broker execution
TMGM (TradeMax Global) — measured execution review
842 measured fills · data through 22 Jul 2026, 16:12 UTC
Based on 842 real fills across 2 connected accounts, TMGM (TradeMax Global) shows a median fill latency of 36ms. Everything below is measured from broker-reported order history and tick data — here's the full methodology. It is not a paid review; there are no affiliate links.
Rank
—
among qualified brokers
Price accuracy
—
slippage vs peers, per symbol
Speed
97/100
fill latency vs peers
Spread
—
at fill time vs peers
Fill quality
Where your executed price landed vs the price requested.
Not enough slippage data to split fills yet.
Month by month · XAUUSD
Monthly medians on the broker’s most-traded symbols — medians, so one news spike doesn’t repaint a month. Points are symbol-specific: switch symbols with the chips, don’t compare across them.
Execution speed
median fill latency (broker-side, order received → filled)
By symbol
Data completeness: latency 92% · spread 0% of fills (missing values come from brokers without ms timestamps or tick history).
| Symbol | Median slippage | ≈ per 1 lot | p95 slippage | Median latency | Avg spread | Fills |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XAUUSD | N/A — insufficient evidence | — | N/A — insufficient evidence | 36 ms | N/A — insufficient evidence | 720 |
| EURGBP | N/A — insufficient evidence | — | N/A — insufficient evidence | 34 ms | N/A — insufficient evidence | 62 |
| AUDNZD | N/A — insufficient evidence | — | N/A — insufficient evidence | N/A — insufficient evidence | N/A — insufficient evidence | 28 |
| USDCHF | N/A — insufficient evidence | — | N/A — insufficient evidence | N/A — insufficient evidence | N/A — insufficient evidence | 20 |
| EURUSD | N/A — insufficient evidence | — | N/A — insufficient evidence | N/A — insufficient evidence | N/A — insufficient evidence | 8 |
| NZDUSD | N/A — insufficient evidence | — | N/A — insufficient evidence | N/A — insufficient evidence | N/A — insufficient evidence | 4 |
Measured from real fills: requested vs executed price from order history, latency from broker millisecond timestamps, spread from the broker’s closest pre-fill tick. Unsupported metrics remain N/A and expose their observation, account and coverage counts on hover. History is broker-reported.
FAQ
Is TMGM (TradeMax Global)'s execution good?
Across the trailing 180-day cohort, TMGM (TradeMax Global) has a relative score of 97/100 against other measured brokers on the same symbols, based on 1 of 3 measured components. It is a cohort comparison, not an absolute quality grade.
How is this measured?
From real fills on connected accounts: slippage compares each order's requested vs executed price in symbol points; latency is the broker's own order-received to order-filled millisecond timestamps; spread uses the closest pre-fill tick in the broker's history. Every displayed metric needs 50 observations from two accounts.
How often does this page update?
Continuously — connected accounts sync about hourly, and every new fill lands in these statistics. The monthly charts use medians, so one news spike doesn't repaint a month.
Want your own fills in these numbers? Connect an account read-only— your broker's stats sharpen with every fill, and you get the full trade journal on top.