Broker execution scoreboard
Broker execution scoreboard
Broker execution comparison
Both brokers are measured from real fills on connected accounts — never from reviews or marketing. Every displayed metric has at least 30 observations from one account on each side, and the execution scores normalize per symbol, so neither broker gains from trading easier symbols. Spread uses the closest pre-fill tick. Unsupported cells remain N/A. No winner is declared: the honest answer depends on the symbols and sessions you trade.
Lower value in bold — a fact per metric, not a verdict. Slippage and spread are in symbol points; latency in milliseconds.
| Symbol | Fusion Markets slippage | IC Trading slippage | Fusion Markets latency | IC Trading latency | Fusion Markets spread | IC Trading spread | Fills (A/B) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EURUSD | 0.096 obs · 1 acct | 1.0173 obs · 1 acct | 32 ms576 obs · 3 accts | 42 ms510 obs · 2 accts | 0.1506 obs · 3 accts | 1.5124 obs · 2 accts | 772 / 716 |
| XAUUSD | N/A2 obs · 1 acct | N/A195 obs · 2 accts | 32 ms400 obs · 3 accts | 43 ms568 obs · 2 accts | 28.0314 obs · 3 accts | 11.1397 obs · 2 accts | 543 / 940 |
Median slippage on the most-traded shared symbol (points; below 0 = price improvement).
Median across all symbols — latency is the one metric that compares across symbols.
Across 1 shared symbol, median slippage: Fusion Markets measured lower on 1.
Across 2 shared symbols, median fill latency: Fusion Markets measured lower on 2.
From real fills on connected accounts at both brokers. Every metric needs at least 30 observations from one account on each side; unsupported cells stay N/A (2 shared symbols with usable evidence today). No reviews, broker marketing or affiliate links.
Full reviews: Fusion Markets · IC Trading — or connect an account read-only and put your own fills in these numbers.