Broker execution scoreboard
Broker execution scoreboard
Broker execution comparison
Both brokers are measured from real fills on connected accounts — never from reviews or marketing. Every displayed metric has at least 30 observations from one account on each side, and the execution scores normalize per symbol, so neither broker gains from trading easier symbols. Spread uses the closest pre-fill tick. Unsupported cells remain N/A. No winner is declared: the honest answer depends on the symbols and sessions you trade.
Lower value in bold — a fact per metric, not a verdict. Slippage and spread are in symbol points; latency in milliseconds.
| Symbol | IC Trading slippage | Ultima Markets slippage | IC Trading latency | Ultima Markets latency | IC Trading spread | Ultima Markets spread | Fills (A/B) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XAUUSD | N/A195 obs · 2 accts | N/A29 obs · 2 accts | 42 ms522 obs · 2 accts | 142 ms1,147 obs · 7 accts | 11.1397 obs · 2 accts | 10.71,168 obs · 7 accts | 974 / 1,560 |
| EURUSD | 1.0158 obs · 1 acct | 0.0216 obs · 2 accts | 42 ms480 obs · 2 accts | 133 ms2,952 obs · 7 accts | 1.5124 obs · 2 accts | 0.62,929 obs · 7 accts | 758 / 3,606 |
Median slippage on the most-traded shared symbol (points; below 0 = price improvement).
Median across all symbols — latency is the one metric that compares across symbols.
Across 1 shared symbol, median slippage: Ultima Markets on 1.
Across 2 shared symbols, median fill latency: IC Trading measured lower on 2.
From real fills on connected accounts at both brokers. Every metric needs at least 30 observations from one account on each side; unsupported cells stay N/A (2 shared symbols with usable evidence today). No reviews, broker marketing or affiliate links.
Full reviews: IC Trading · Ultima Markets — or connect an account read-only and put your own fills in these numbers.