Broker execution scoreboard
Broker execution scoreboard
Measured execution speed
Execution speed here is the broker's own millisecond timestamps — the gap between the order reaching the server and the fill — so it excludes your internet connection and measures only what the broker controls. Across 1,102 measured fills on 4 connected accounts, Mega Fusion Group filled orders in a median of 104ms, with 95% of fills inside 175ms. The p95 matters more than the median if you trade news: it's the slow tail that costs money.
On XAUUSD, Mega Fusion Group's measured fill latency ranks 4 of 12 measured brokers.
Median fill latency across all symbols — latency is the one metric that compares across symbols.
median, broker-side (order received → filled)
Median and p95 fill latency per symbol.
| Symbol | Median latency |
|---|
Median 104ms from order received to filled, measured on 1,102 real fills; the slowest 5% took longer than 175ms. The session table shows how that shifts across the trading day.
From the broker's own order history: MT5 records when the server received the order and when it filled, in milliseconds. That isolates the broker's processing from your network latency — a slow VPS can't make a broker look bad here, and a fast one can't make it look good.
For scalping and news trading, yes — hundreds of milliseconds move prices. For swing trades held days, median latency is nearly irrelevant, though a long p95 tail can still hurt stop-loss fills in fast markets.
Read more: What Execution Speed Is Normal in MT5? Read Lifecycle Timing Correctly · Broker Execution Quality: Measure Slippage, Lifecycle Timing and Spread — or connect an account read-only and put your own fills in these numbers.
| p95 latency |
|---|
| Fills |
|---|
| XAUUSD | 104 ms | 175 ms | 1,092 |
| EURUSD | N/A — insufficient evidence | N/A — insufficient evidence | 10 |