Broker execution

Startrader — measured execution review

1,734 measured fills · data through 22 Jul 2026, 16:12 UTC

Based on 1,734 real fills across 4 connected accounts, Startrader shows a median slippage of 0.0 points and a median fill latency of 137ms. Everything below is measured from broker-reported order history and tick data — here's the full methodology. It is not a paid review; there are no affiliate links.

Relative execution score
68
3/3 measured components
Rank
#2 of 7
among qualified brokers
Price accuracy
81/100
slippage vs peers, per symbol
Speed
30/100
fill latency vs peers
Spread
90/100
at fill time vs peers

Fill quality

Where your executed price landed vs the price requested.

Better price 0% Exact price 66% Worse price 34%

~$6.63/lot fees + negative swap per lot · 94% currency coverage

Month by month · XAUUSD

Monthly medians on the broker’s most-traded symbols — medians, so one news spike doesn’t repaint a month. Points are symbol-specific: switch symbols with the chips, don’t compare across them.

Price accuracy

median slippage · 0 = filled at the requested price, below 0 = price improvement

2026-05: 0.0 pts · 478 fills0.0May2026-06: 0.0 pts · 414 fills0.0Jun2026-07: 0.0 pts · 638 fills0.0Jul

Execution speed

median fill latency (broker-side, order received → filled)

2026-04: 136.0 ms · 204 fills136Apr2026-05: 138.0 ms · 478 fills138May2026-06: 136.0 ms · 414 fills136Jun2026-07: 136.0 ms · 638 fills136Jul

By session

Execution quality across the trading day (UTC windows).

SessionMedian slippagep95 slippageMedian latencyAvg spreadFills
Asia (00–07 UTC)N/A — insufficient evidenceN/A — insufficient evidenceN/A — insufficient evidenceN/A — insufficient evidence39
London (07–13 UTC)N/A — insufficient evidenceN/A — insufficient evidenceN/A — insufficient evidenceN/A — insufficient evidence8
New York (13–21 UTC)N/A — insufficient evidenceN/A — insufficient evidence139 ms12.9 pts76

Slippage distribution · XAUUSD

Points; negative = price improvement, positive = worse fill.

≤ −20 pts (better)0≥ +20 pts (worse)

By symbol

Data completeness: latency 84% · spread 10% of fills (missing values come from brokers without ms timestamps or tick history).

SymbolMedian slippage≈ per 1 lotp95 slippageMedian latencyAvg spreadFills
XAUUSD0.0 pts≈$0.0074.5 pts137 ms13.1 pts1,734

Measured from real fills: requested vs executed price from order history, latency from broker millisecond timestamps, spread from the broker’s closest pre-fill tick. Unsupported metrics remain N/A and expose their observation, account and coverage counts on hover. History is broker-reported.

FAQ

Is Startrader's execution good?

Across the trailing 180-day cohort, Startrader has a relative score of 68/100 against other measured brokers on the same symbols, based on 3 of 3 measured components, ranking #2 of 7. It is a cohort comparison, not an absolute quality grade.

How is this measured?

From real fills on connected accounts: slippage compares each order's requested vs executed price in symbol points; latency is the broker's own order-received to order-filled millisecond timestamps; spread uses the closest pre-fill tick in the broker's history. Every displayed metric needs 50 observations from two accounts.

How often does this page update?

Continuously — connected accounts sync about hourly, and every new fill lands in these statistics. The monthly charts use medians, so one news spike doesn't repaint a month.

Want your own fills in these numbers? Connect an account read-only— your broker's stats sharpen with every fill, and you get the full trade journal on top.